By Toby Young: January 14th, 2013 LINK HERE FOR TELEGRAPH
Julie Burchill has given me permission to reprint the
article the Observer has seen fit to unpublish. This is the full text.
The brilliant writer Suzanne Moore and I go back a long way.
I first met her when she was a young single mother living in a council flat;
she took me out to interview me about my novel Ambition (re-published by Corvus
Books this spring, since you ask) for dear dead City Limits magazine.
"I’ve got an entertaining budget of £12.50!" she said proudly.
"Sod that, we’re having lobster and champagne at Frederick’s, and I’m
paying," I told her. Half a bottle of Bolly later, she looked at me with
faraway eyes: "Ooo, I could get to like this…’ And so she did.
I have observed her rise to the forefront of this country’s
great polemicists with a whole lot of pride – and just a tiny bit of envy. I am
godmother to her three brilliant, beautiful daughters. Though we differ on
certain issues we will have each others backs till the sacred cows come home.
With this in mind, I was incredulous to read that my friend
was being monstered on Twitter, to the extent that she had quit it, for
supposedly picking on a minority – transsexuals. Though I imagine it to be
something akin to being savaged by a dead sheep, as Denis Healey had it of
Geoffrey Howe, I nevertheless felt indignant that a woman of such style and
substance should be driven from her chosen mode of time-wasting by a bunch of
dicks in chick’s clothing.
To my mind – I have given cool-headed consideration to the
matter – a gaggle of transsexuals telling Suzanne Moore how to write looks a
lot like how I’d imagine the Black & White Minstrels telling Usain Bolt how
to run would look. That rude and ridic.
Here’s what happened. In a book of essays called Red: The
Waterstones Anthology, Suzanne contributed a piece about women’s anger. She
wrote that, amongst other things, women were angry about "not having the
ideal body shape – that of a Brazilian transsexual". Rather than join her
in decrying the idea that every broad should aim to look like an oven-ready
porn star, the very vociferous transsexual lobby and their grim groupies picked
on the messenger instead.
I must say that my only experience of the trans lobby thus
far was hearing about the vile way they have persecuted another of my friends,
the veteran women’s rights and anti-domestic violence activist Julie Bindel,
picketing events where she is speaking about such minor issues as the rape of
children and the trafficking of women just because she refuses to accept that
their relationship with their phantom limb is the most pressing problem that
women – real and imagined – are facing right now.
Similarly, Suzanne’s original piece was about the real
horror of the bigger picture – how the savagery of a few old Etonians is having
real, ruinous effects on the lives of the weakest members of our society, many
of whom happen to be women. The reaction of the trans lobby reminded me very
much of those wretched inner-city kids who shoot another inner-city kid dead in
a fast-food shop for not showing him enough ‘respect’. Ignore the real enemy –
they’re strong and will need real effort and organization to fight. How much
easier to lash out at those who are conveniently close to hand!
But they’d rather argue over semantics. To be fair, after
having one’s nuts taken off (see what I did there?)) by endless decades in
academia, it’s all most of them are fit to do. Educated beyond all common sense
and honesty, it was a hoot to see the screaming-mimis accuse Suze of white feminist
privilege; it may have been this which made her finally respond in the
subsequent salty language she employed to answer her Twitter critics:
"People can just fuck off really. Cut their dicks off and be more feminist
than me. Good for them."
She, the other JB and I are part of the tiny minority of
women of working-class origin to make it in what used to be called Fleet Street
and I think this partly contributes to the stand-off with the trannies. (I know
that’s a wrong word, but having recently discovered that their lot describe
born women as ‘Cis’ – sounds like syph, cyst, cistern; all nasty stuff –
they’re lucky I’m not calling them shemales. Or shims.) We know that everything
we have, we got for ourselves. We have no family money, no safety net. And we
are damned if we are going to be accused of being privileged by a bunch of
bed-wetters in bad wigs.
It’s been noted before that cyberspace, though supposedly
all new and shiny, is plagued by the age old boredom of men telling women not
to talk, and threatening them will all kinds of nastiness if they persist in
saying what they feel.
The trans lobby are now saying that it wasn’t so much the
initial piece as Suzanne’s refusal to apologise when told to that
"made" them drive her from Twitter. Presumably she is meant to do
this in the name of solidarity and the "struggle" – though I find it
very hard to imagine this mob struggling with anything apart from the English
language and the concept of free speech.
To have your cock cut off and then plead special privileges
as women – above natural-born women, who don’t know the meaning of suffering,
apparently – is a bit like the old definition of chutzpah: the boy who killed
his parents and then asked the jury for clemency on the grounds he was an
orphan.
Shims, shemales, whatever you’re calling yourselves these
days – don't threaten or bully we lowly
natural-born women, I warn you. We may not have as many lovely big swinging
Phds as you, but we’ve experienced a lifetime of PMT and sexual harassment, and
many of us are now staring HRT and the menopause straight in the face – and
still not flinching. Trust me, you ain’t
seen nothing yet. You really won’t like us when we’re angry.