Below are a few more articles on the subject (although I find Fiona Elvines viewpoint in the 3rd article "Should accessing 'rape pornography' be restricted by law? The guardian" quite uneducated and personally offensive )
We Need Education on Porn, Not Censorship
Anything described as " a victory for the Daily Mail" should probably immediately arouse our suspicion. In this case it encapsulates precisely what is most baffling and offensive about David Cameron's war on internet porn.
Don't ban 'rape porn' - introduce more porn with negotiation and boundary-setting
As a feminist, I am against rape, against abuse of children, and wholeheartedly in favour of grinding the culture which allows these things to happen into dust. That's why I'm against David Cameron's latest proposals for increased filtering of the internet, blocking search terms and banning porn depicting simulated rape.
Should accessing 'rape pornography' be restricted by law?
Anna Arrowsmith: people know the difference between entertainment and real life It is with dismay that I see some women's groups have welcomed David Cameron's drive against simulated rape in pornography. Rape is not caused by pornography. This is something Cameron should bear in mind as he uses the fear of sexual crime to bolster his case for a crackdown.
No comments:
Post a Comment